Microfacies Analysis and Diagenesis Processes of Mauddud Formation in selected wells from Ratawi oil field, Southern Iraq

Authors

  • Salah Hussain Department of Petroleum Geology and Minerals, College of Science, University of Diyala
  • Mustafa Lateef Hameed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24237/ASJ.02.02.761B

Keywords:

Key Words: Mauddud Formation, Ratawi oilfield, Microfacies, Diagenesis processes

Abstract

Mauddud Formation was studied in Ratawi oil field, Southern Iraq. The lithology of the formation is limestone in all studied wells (Rt-2, Rt-4, Rt-17 and Rt-19). lower contact of Mauddud Formation with Nahr Umr Formation is gradational, but the upper contact is unconformable with Ahmadi Formation.

In this work, 114 thin sections were examined and shows four microfacies (wackestone, packstone, grainstone and argillaceous mudstone), which deposited in the Inner-Mid to Outer ramp environment. The most significant diagenesis processes were micritization, dissolution, cementation, compaction, and dolomitization, which had an impact on the texture and porosity of the Mauddud Formation.

 

References

• Iraqi national oil company, 1978. Preliminary evaluation of Ratawi reservoirs field. Unpublished (Arabic).

• Sadooni, F. N. and Alsharhan, A.S., 2003. Stratigraphy, microfacies, and petroleum potential of the Mauddud Formation (Albian – Cenomanian) in the Arabian Gulf basin, The American Association of petroleum geologists bulletin, volume 87, no.10, pp. (1633 –1680).

• Jassim, S. Z., and Goff, J. C., 2006. Geology of Iraq, Published by Dolin,

Prague and Moravian Museum, Bron, 341 P.

• Allaby, M. 2008. Dictionary of Earth Sciences. 3 ed. Oxford University Press.

• Flugel, E. 2010. Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks, Analyasis Interpertation and Appliaction, 2nd edition, 1006 p.

• Larsen, G. and Chilingar, G. V. 1979. Diagenesis in Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks, Elsevier, 589 P.

• Tucker, М.Е. 1985. Sedimentary Petrology. An lntroduction, рр. 252. Blackwells, Oxford.

• Ahr, W.M., 2008. Geology of Carbonate Reservoir. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, 277 p.

• Selley, R. C. 2000. Applied sedimentology. second edition, 474 p.

• Scholle, P. A. and Ulmer-Scholle, D. 2003. A Color Guide to the Petrography of Carbonate Rocks: Grains, textures, porosity, diagenesis. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. 459 P.

• Flugel E., 2004. Microfacies analysis of limestones, analysis interpretation and application: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 976 P.

• Choquette P.W. and Pray L.C., 1970. Geologic nomenclature and classification of porosity in sedimentary carbonates. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, memoir 54, issue 2, pp. 207-250.

• Lucia, F. J. 2012. Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: An Integrated Approach, first edition, Springer.

• Longman, M. (1980), Carbonate Diagenetic Environments, AAPG Bulletin, 4, pp. 461–487.

• Bathrust, R. G. C. (1975), Carbonate sediment and diagenesis. Development in sedimentology-12, (2nd ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 659p.

• Kurniawan, T. A., and Lo, W. H. (2009). Removal of refractory compounds from stabilized landfill leachate using an integrated H2O2 oxidation and granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption treatment. Water research, vol. 43, no.16, pp. 4079-4091.

• Choquette, P and James, N. P. 1987, ‘Diagenesis in limestone-3, the deep burial environment’, Geoscience Canada, 14, pp. 3–35.

• Wanless, H. R. 1979. Limestone response to stress: Pressure solution and dolomitization. Journal of Sedimentology Petrology., volume 49, pp 437-462.

• Nichols G., 2009, Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, 2nd ed. A John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Publication, West Sussex, 419 P.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Microfacies Analysis and Diagenesis Processes of Mauddud Formation in selected wells from Ratawi oil field, Southern Iraq. (2024). Academic Science Journal, 2(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.24237/ASJ.02.02.761B