Geotechnical and Geophysical Methods for Water Content Prediction of Compacted Soil Southern Baqubah City

Authors

  • Asem Hassan College of Science, University of Diyala
  • Gehan Usama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24237/ASJ.02.03.777B

Abstract

Water content affects the soil state, consistency, and engineering behavior of various engineering projects. Evaluation of water content is, therefore, crucial to maintain the stability of these projects. Geotechnical and geoelectrical techniques are integrated in this study to characterize the soil, with a particular interest in the water (moisture) content, southern Baqubah City. Twenty soil specimens, manually collected using a hand Auger and the core cutter method, were used. Basic geotechnical tests were first implemented to characterize and classify the soil. Secondly, compaction characteristics referred to as, Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) and Maximum Dry Density (MDD), were determined using Standard Proctor compaction (SPC) and Modified Proctor Compaction (MPC) tests, which are essential to evaluate the compaction process. Thirdly, the resistivity of the compacted specimens was measured and compared with soil water content obtained using the oven drying method. ASTM standards were followed in all laboratory tests. Finally, geotechnical and geoelectrical methods were integrated for water content prediction. The results showed that, based on USCS, the soil is of low plasticity, fine-grained type (CL) and (CL-ML). The average LL, PL, and PI values were 25.50, 18.61, and 6.89, respectively. The average MDD and OMC values were 1.75 g/cm3, and 17.18%, for SPC tests, and 1.90 g/cm3 and 13.24%, for MPC tests, respectively. The resistivity was non-linearly correlated with water content with R2 values (>0.99) for all samples which indicates the potential of using this method, as a non-destructive and low-cost method, for the evaluation of the water content of compacted soils. The relationships between the measured and predicted values for SPC (R2=0.911) and MPC (R2=0.934) tests, respectively, confirm the usefulness of using the resistivity method to provide a quick and preliminary evaluation of soil water content.

References

T.W. Lambe and R.V. Whitman, “Soil Mechanics”, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 553p (1969).

ASTM D2216, “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2019).

S.B. Jones and D. Or, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, pp.1568-1577 (2004).

D.A. Robinson, C.S. Campbell, J.W. Hopmans, B.K., Hornbuckle, S.B., Jones, R. Knight,

F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O.Wendroth, Vadose Zone J., 7, pp. 358-389 (2008).

Y.L Beck, S.P Lopes, V. Ferber, and P. Côte, Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1-14 (2011).

L.S. Bryson, “Proc. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics”, GSP 133, Geo-Frontiers ASCE, Reston, VA.1-12 (2005).

A. Samouëlian, I. Cousin, A. Tabbagh, A. Bruand, and G. Richard, Soil Tillage Res.,83, pp. 173- 193, (2005).

A.A., Hassan, Diyala Journal for Pure Sciences, Vol 13, Issue 2-part2, 197-2016 (2017).

J.A. Muñoz-Castelblanco, P. Delage, J.M. Pereira and Y.J. Cui, Geotechnique 62(7), 595-604 (2012).

Z. Abu-Hassanein, C. Benson and L. Blotz, J.Geotech. Eng.122, 39-406 (1996).

M. Fukue, T. Minatoa, H. Horibe and N. Taya, Eng. Geol. 54, 43-53 (1999).

W.J. McCarter, Geotechnique 34, 263-267 (1984).

G. Calamita, L.Brocca, A. Perrone, S. Piscitelli, V. Lapenna, F. Melone, T.J. Moramarco, Hydrol., 454-455, 101-112 (2012).

W. Bai, W., L. Kong, and A. Guo, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp. 406-411 (2013).

M.B. Memon, W.H. Qazi, and S.M. Pathan,, International Conference on Sustainable Development in Civil Engineering, MUET, Pakistan, pp. (1-5) (2017).

P.H. Shah, and D.N Singh, J. of ASTM Inter., 2 (5), pp. 1-20 (2005)

ASTM D698, “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3))”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2012).

ASTM D1557, “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3))”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. (2007).

A.A. Hassan, and D. Toll, XVI ECSMGE conference, Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development, Edinburgh, pp. 3395-3400 (2015).

E. Uygar and B. Alibrahim, KSCE J Civ. Eng., vol. 25, pp. 2381–2393 (2021).

ASTM D2937, “Standard Test Method for Density of Soil in Place by the Drive-Cylinder Method”, ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. USA (2017).

ASTM D2487, 2017. “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

ASTM D422, “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (1972).

ASTM D4318, “Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils”, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, (2005).

ASTM G187, “Standard test method for measurement of soil resistivity using the two-electrode soil box method”, ASTM. Pennsylvania, USA. (2005).

Al-Ebdaa Company, “Soil investigation report for the new buildings of Diyala University- Part II,” ESR-015-08, (2015).

M. Budhu, Soil Mechanics.1st ed.John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom, 373p (2015).

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Hassan, A., & Usama, G. (2023). Geotechnical and Geophysical Methods for Water Content Prediction of Compacted Soil Southern Baqubah City. Academic Science Journal, 2(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.24237/ASJ.02.03.777B

Issue

Section

Articles