the Calculation of gaseous storage and Building A 3D Geological model for Jeribe Formation in Mansuriya gas field in Diyala governorate
Calculation of gaseous storage and Building A 3D Geological model for Jeribe Formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24237/ASJ.02.04.823BKeywords:
Jeribe Formation, 3D geological model, Mansuriya gas field, petrel softwareAbstract
Al-Mansuriya gas field is considered one of the important gas fields in Iraq because of its good economic gas reserves, The major gas reserves of the Mansuriya field are situated in the Jeribe formation, The period of formation deposition dates back to the lower middle Miocene. The present study aims to build the three-dimensional geological model for Jeribe Formation in Mansuriya Gas Field using (Petrel) software. Drawing on well logs exported from Techlog software in LAS format. Four wells have been chosen in the mansuriya gas field (MN_1, MN_2, MN_3, MN_4) to construct Structural and petrophysical (effective porosity, water saturation and lithology) models. After creating zones for Jeribe Formation, which was divided into 7 zones J1, J2, J3, J4, J5, J6 and J7 zone, Based on the final results of computer processing interpretation CPI was imported from techlog software. The three-dimensional grid of the Jeribe Formation model that was built consists of (10494848) cell and each cell have dimensions I =272 * J = 371 * K =104. Petrophysical models (effective porosity, water saturation and lithology) had been constructed for each zone of the Jeribe Formation showing the J2, J3, J4 and J5 are important reservoir units in terms of their good properties (high effective porosity, low water saturation) and Two types of lithology appear (dolomite and limestone) in different proportions to each unit. The results showed that Units J1 and J6 are non-reservoir units that do not contain gas because they consist of layers of anhydrite with very low porosity. The mn-4 well showed different results from the rest of the wells, and none of its units can’t be considered a reservoir due to the large water saturation volume.
References
A. K. Turner, C. W. Gable, (A review of Geological Modeling. Colorado School of Mines, USA, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los ,2008)
Schlumberger, Petrel Geology and Modeling, Petrel Introduction Course, 559(2013)
The Oil Exploration Company studied the field from the geological point of view, This study includes the interpretation and analysis of records and the calculation of gas reserves for the Mansouriya gas field. (2007) Unpublished study Schlumberger, Seismic-to-Simulation Software, Petrel Introduction Course Schlumberger, 50-334(2008)
Schlumberger, (b), Reservoir engineering course, Schlumberger, 137- 177 (2010)
S. Pack, Creating 3D models of lithology using 3D grids, Dynamic Graphics INC., Alameda(2000)
Schlumberger, Petrel online help, Petrel Introduction Course Schlumberger, 560(2009)
Schlumberger, Petrel Structural modeling course Schlumberger (2007), 105-123p.
M. Ataei, Log Facies Evaluation and Property Modeling of a Turbidite Reservoir, the Gulf of Mexico. A thesis submitted to Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Geology and Mineral Resources-Norway, 103(2013)
J. P. Bellorini, J. Casas, P. Gilly, P.Jannes, P. Matthews, Definition of a 3D Integrated Geological Model in a complex and Extensive Heavy Oil Field, Oficina Formation, Faja de Orinoco, Venezuela Sincor OPCO, Caracas, Venezuela, (2003)
Anon, Training Course on Oil and Gas, Vol.II – Well Log Interpretation, Univ. Lusiada De Lisboa, Inst. Lusiada Para a Energia,102 (2004)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 CC BY 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.