Study of Improving the Combustion Rate of Fuel Used in Steam Electric Power Stations Using PentoMag
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24237/04.02.678Keywords:
PentoMag, Power Plants, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Carbon Dioxide (CO2)Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effect of the commercial treatment material (PentoMag) on combustion completeness in fossil-fueled steam power plants, using the unburned carbon fraction in the ash as a key indicator. Ash samples were collected daily over 10 days, purified, weighed, and combusted in a laboratory furnace to determine unburned carbon content. The concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) were also measured using a specialized gas analyzer. Results indicated that the unburned carbon fraction was significantly high prior to treatment, reflecting incomplete combustion. Following treatment with the material, a notable reduction in the percentage of unburned carbon was observed, indicating greater fuel oxidation and improved overall combustion efficiency. Additionally, CO and CO₂ emissions decreased, demonstrating improved environmental performance of the combustion process. These findings suggest that the treatment material can effectively promote complete combustion and reduce harmful emissions in thermal power plants.
Downloads
References
[1] The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica. Electric power. Article, 2024.
[2] Al-Kurdi, Mohammed Ali. "Principles of Electrical Energy." 2nd ed., 2019, Dar Al-Ilm Lilmalayin. Page (X).
[3] Larki, I., Zahedi, A., Asadi, M., Forootan, M. M., Farajollahi, M., Ahmadi, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2023). Mitigation approaches and techniques for flue gas emissions from combustion power plants: A comprehensive review—Science of The Total Environment, 166108.
[4] Celestin, S. B., Bilal, P., Diane, H., & David, G. (2012). Efficient Combustion: A Process Synthesis Approach to Improve the Efficiency of Coal-Fired Power Stations.
[5] Khaleel, O. J., Ismail, F. B., Ibrahim, T. K., & Abu Hassan, S. H. (2022). Energy and exergy analysis of the steam power plants: A comprehensive review of the Classification, Development, Improvements, and configurations. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101640.
[6] Ramzan, M., Raza, S. A., Usman, M., Sharma, G. D., & Iqbal, H. A. (2022). Environmental cost of non-renewable energy and economic progress: do ICT and financial development mitigate some burden? Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130066.
[7] Khattak, M. A., Ashraff, M. A., Ikmal, M., Syafiq, A., & Hazritz, M. (2016). Common types of fuels in steam power plants: a review. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 23(1), 1-2 4.
[8] Xu, G., Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Liang, F., Xu, C., & Yang, Y. (2015). Optimum superheat utilization of extraction steam in double-reheat ultra-supercritical power plants. Applied Energy, 160, 863-872.
[9] Beér, J. M. (2007). High-efficiency electric power generation: The environmental role. Progress in Energy and combustion science, 33(2), 107-134.
[10] McLaughlin, E., Choi, J. K., & Kissock, K. (2022). Techno-economic impact assessments of energy efficiency improvements in the industrial combustion systems. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 144(8), 082109.
[11] Beer, J. M. (2000). The article discusses the advancements in combustion technology in power generation as a response to environmental challenges. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26(4-6), 301-327.
[12] Krüger, M., Muslubas, S., Loeper, T., Klasing, F., Knödler, P., & Mielke, C. (2020). Potentials of thermal energy storage integrated into steam power plants. Energies, 13(9), 2226.
[13] Nussbaumer, T. (2003). Combustion and co-combustion of biomass: fundamentals, technologies, and primary measures for emission reduction. Energy & fuels, 17(6), 1510-1521.
[14] John Smith, Jane Doe. "Enhancing Efficiency in Fossil Fuel Power Plants." journal Energy Policy. 2020.
[15] Birol, F. (2019). The future of hydrogen: seizing today's opportunities. The IEA report was prepared for the G20.
[16] Roslyakov, P., Pleshanov, K., Shchelchkov, K., & Rudomazin, V. (2022, July). Moderate-intensity chemical incomplete combustion of fuel. This study was published in the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1061, No. 1, p. 012037). IOP Publishing.
[17] Wang, X., Zhu, Y., Hu, Z., Zhang, L., Yang, S., Ruan, R., ... & Tan, H. (2020). Characteristics of ash and slag from four biomass-fired power plants: Ash/slag ratio, unburned carbon, and leaching of major and trace elements: energy conversion and management, 214, 112897.
[18] Bettles, N. D., & STUART, D. (2001). Improving combustion efficiency by incorporating CO monitoring. Modern power systems (MAI), 47-51.
[19] Roslyakov, P. V., Pleshanov, K. A., & Ionkin, I. L. (2010). The optimal conditions for firing fuel with controlled incomplete combustion. Thermal engineering, 57, 290-295.
[20] Pentomag - Fuel Oil Fired Power Plants - Additive for HFO Boilers by Pentol-Enviro AG (energy-xprt.com)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 CC BY 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
