Role of Reviewers

The Academic Science Journal (ASJ) welcomes qualified researchers and academic experts to join its panel of reviewers. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the journal’s scientific quality, integrity, and credibility through a rigorous and transparent peer-review process.

Role of Reviewers

Reviewers are responsible for:

• Evaluating submitted manuscripts objectively and confidentially

• Assessing originality, scientific significance, methodology, and clarity

• Providing constructive and unbiased feedback to authors

• Supporting editorial decisions through professional recommendations

ASJ follows a double-blind peer review system, ensuring that both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remain anonymous throughout the review process.

Reviewer Qualifications

To be considered as a reviewer, candidates should:

• Hold a PhD or equivalent academic qualification

• Have a strong publication record in reputable journals

• Possess expertise in one or more fields of pure or applied sciences

• Demonstrate commitment to academic ethics and review timelines

Ethical Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

• Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents

• Declare any potential conflicts of interest

• Review manuscripts objectively, fairly, and within the assigned timeframe

• Adhere to the journal’s publication ethics and COPE guidelines

Benefits of Reviewing for ASJ

• Recognition of academic contribution to the scholarly community

• Reviewer certificates upon request

• Consideration for editorial board membership based on performance

• Contribution to the advancement of scientific research and quality publishing

How to Become a Reviewer

Researchers interested in joining ASJ as reviewers are invited to:

• Register through the journal website

• Update their profile with areas of expertise

• Indicate their willingness to serve as a reviewer

The editorial team will contact eligible candidates when manuscripts matching their expertise are submitted.